Laclale-NC
http://rpcsandbox.wikidot.com/laclale
"Laclale-NC" tab.
Laclale-NC Draft
Forum
» Writing & Drafts / Archived Drafts
» Laclale-NC Draft
Summary:
A note that generates an RPC document that you would like to delete. Someone can crit this?
The document inside of 5225253-NC is published on the Authority's database via the Internet with rating module.*
The document contained within 5225253-NC is published on the Authority's online database with an attached rating module.
The text within 5225253-NC describes anomalous objects and entities written within standard Authority format, the existence of which is still ongoing.*
(Run on sentence, break up and edit:)
The text within 5225253-NC describes anomalous objects and entities utilizing standard Authority format. Attempts to verify thier existence are ongoing.
Observers who read the contents of the 5225253-NC will generally lose interest within the contents and cease observation, but will rarely undergo a reaction wherein they become enraged by the contents of the page.
(Run on sentence. break up and edit:)
Individuals reading the contents of 5225253-NC generally will lose interest in the documents and abandon attempts at further observation. In rare cases seemingly interspersed at random individuals will become irrationally enraged at the contents of 5225253-NC.
The presence of a rating module and an understanding that low rated content will be deleted is enough to channel this impulse entierly into giving the page a low rating, regardless of if there is any genuine intent to delete the content.
(run on sentence. Break up and edit.)
The addition of a rating module to digital copies and the deception that low rated content will be deleted has been used sucessfully to negate this effect. Individuals will universally give the article a low rating, regardless of if the stated deletion policy is genuine or not.
Retitle drop-down suggestion: Verified artifacts listed in 5225253-NC
retitle opened drop-down suggestion: Access granted, displaying results
Over all thoughts:
The idea that some document listing objects not yet recovered by authority personel but that may exist is a potential gold mine for development. That being said, giving ones self too much room to develop an idea can be a pitfall. If given proper attention and a high degree of planning it can turn out good, but if neglected it can become a dead end, or worse, turn into a "quantity over quality" article mill where poorly developed ideas are shoe horned in. This is less a critique of the concept and more of a warning that potential is good, but that solid project development is better.
That aside, I would like to reserve judgement to see what this idea branches out and grows into.
I'm not entierly sure what -NC means, but i'll give it a shot.
RPC-5225253-NC is to be kept in a standard 5m3 anomalous object containment cell at THQ. At least two Authority agents (Task Force ███████) are to be posted at the entrance to RPC-5225253-NC's containment cell at all times for prevented stealing of entire pages.
You can pretty much cut off "at all times for prevented stealing of entire pages." because it's not really necessary information
Description: RPC-5225253-NC is a yellow binder notebook that contains writings from an unknown author. The text within 5225253-NC describes anomalous things as RPC format, the investigations of which are still ongoing.
Might want to change everything past "anomalous things" to "anomalous objects and entities written within standard Authority format, the existence of which is still ongoing."
Users who read the contents of the 5225253-NC will most likely lose interest in the contents, but rarely get angry and tear, throw it away.
"Observers who read the contents of the 5225253-NC will generally lose interest within the contents and cease observation, but will rarely undergo a reaction wherein they become enraged by the contents of the page."
If content is reprinted on non-paper, someone who sees it will try to break it. If reprinted on digital instead, someone who sees it will try to delete it. If there is an rating module and low-rate deletion rule, someone who sees it tries to give a low rating. However, nothing happens when convinced that it really exists.
"If the contents of 5225253-NC are reprinted on a non-paper medium, observers will attempt to destroy it upon reading. If displayed digitially, observers will attempt to delete it if possible. The presence of a rating module and an understanding that low rated content will be deleted is enough to channel this impulse entierly into giving the page a low rating, regardless of if there is any genuine intent to delete the content."
/forum/t-12813808/laclale-nc-draft#post-
