RPC Authority

All methods of monitoring RPC-XXX are to not use wireless signals within 15 km of RPC-XXX-A

All methods of monitoring RPC-XXX within 15 km of RPC-XXX-A should not involved the usage of wireless signals

monitored for hostile behavior until safe to say otherwise.

until determined otherwise

EMPs

EMP generators

square meters

m^^2^^ => m²

cubic kilometer

km^^3^^ => km³

likely based on occurrences towards preexisting RPC-XXX-B instances.

but is theorized to be based on situations and circumstances experienced by pre-existing RPC-XXX-B instances.

but have shown insectoid forms when remaining nearby RPC-XXX-A

but RPC-XXX-B instances near RPC-XXX-A often takes insectoid forms

cannot be deactivated by current authority technology

Authority

MST ████-█ went inside RPC-XXX-A to note how it function

to document how

Eight hours afterward

afterwards

hijacked the signal of all sites within a 15 km radius

I suggest changing it to just OL-Site-XXX which is set up to contain the RPC

The US military

Maybe change it to the JTFO(Joint Task Force Occult) which is the military Agency of Interest of the US

12 RPC Personnel casualties

12 Authority personnel casualties

13 Personnel casualties

reduce the number of personnel casualties and just have them be injured by the blast

The article right now definitely needs more expansion to it, a good exploration of the anomaly is to expose the -B robots to specific environments to create technology that can be potentially beneficial to the Authority, salvaged from new instances and reverse-engineered by either the Authority or Nucorp Industry.

As usual, not explaining everything.

If evacuation isn't possible, Class P or R Amnestics, signal jamming devices, and/or duplicates of possibly-affected electronics are to be prepared, to prevent information on RPC-XXX from being spread.

This sentence sounds unclinical, I suppose. This is why passive voice is recommended.

The total size of RPC-XXX-A is estimated to be a km3 in total size

1 km. These things always require numbers.

Based on data from tests and exploration logs, the interior of RPC-XXX-A holds and uses various forms of industrial machinery, mainly consisting of laser-based cutting and welding, and multi-purpose robotics.

I think most of the commas can be removed. The first sentence can also be removed.

There has been no documentation of any supplies, that would be used for the creation of RPC-XXX-B instances, entering RPC-XXX-A through any known methods.

Same issue here.

Two pieces of advice. The first is to reduce the number of commas. The second is to use passive voice as much as you can. These things will greatly improve this article's grammar.

Located at 34°00'00.0"N 105°00'00.0"W

Sounds very exact. A bit too exact and convenient. I suggest mentioning this coincidence.

Also, this format seems unnecessary. It's fine being in one tab. Format breaks for the sake of it often attract well-warranted criticism.

Also, some of the update logs seem to do no more than repeat information that we already know of. I suggest either removing them or moving some of the information to the description.

The exploration log is also a bit short in terms of length. I suggest either expanding it or removing it because it's in a lukewarm spot right now. The format of "MST ████-█" is also incorrect. I suggest reading articles to see how it's done.

A robot factory is a decent idea, and it's anomalous effects are largely "consistent" in the sense that they make sense.

My issue is that what we know about the robots is presented in too much repetition. We are told that the robots explode 3 times. This is especially problematic when one realizes that articles are supposed to be clinical and "bloat" does not go with clinical conciseness.

There is potential for us learning about the facility and the robots at the same time as the reader. I suggest referencing SCP-1983, RPC-068, and SCP-1780 on what I mean by "learning at the same time".

Then again, there is the question of what there is to learn from this article. I would suggest giving some of it's "update properties" as things that we can learn along.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1983
http://www.rpc-wiki.net/rpc-068
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1780

2 at it's current state now. 3 from reverting to a better format and improved grammar. 4 from adding better "information flow".