Test log 08, space out the results a bit, other than that. It's a decent instrumental RPC
It's an X that makes people use it.
I think you're better off making it so that the people play the piano willingly.
Also, I suggest watching the clinical tone, because the clinicalness of this article feels kind of limited.
2 now.
It's a pretty okay piece.
To the author: Are you still around? I'd like to discuss with you on how to improve the article.
It could do with a picture. Any pic of a white baby grand piano, and just insert a caption of how it's freshly fed or something.
Maybe include a recovered note that may possibly hint to its origin.
You should still include test logs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. It's odd to see them missing - at least write them down and strikethrough them or something and say they've been expunged of data or whatnot.
Why is it necessary for the containment procedures that this thing is played? I get that it falls into a state of disrepair but can't you just fix it normally? Wear gloves so you don't come into contact with it maybe?
This article isn't very interesting, but also feels a little too complicated to be enjoyable in its simplicity. It's also got some outdated writing quirks, and it neglects to mention that the piano itself rots, so you just have to infer that from other details in the article.
…And ending an article with "I’m starting to think this thing isn’t your typical anomalous object" is really stupid, especially when it is a pretty bland object. 2/5